The Construction Contracts Co.
Contract Forms

The builder's own subcontract template - what the pattern actually looks like

Most commercial subbies never see a standard form - they see the builder's own template, drafted by the builder's lawyers, refined over years, and issued as "our standard terms". We hold 10 publicly published builder-authored subcontract templates in the corpus. Read together, they describe the pattern with unusual clarity - and the pattern is not an accident.

What the drafting says

EOT notice window
Median 2 days — n=9 identifiable, ranging 2-10. Seven of the nine give you two days to notice a delay claim.
Time bar drafting
Absolute in 7 of 7 — every template where the drafting was identifiable extinguishes late claims entirely.
Set-off
Without notice in 10 of 10 — not one of the ten requires telling you before deducting.
Termination for convenience
10 of 10 — universal in the pattern.
Release deed before final payment
10 of 10 — final payment conditioned on signing a release - read what it releases.
Payment terms
Median 35 days — n=10, ranging 25-60 - the tail runs well past the statutory caps in QLD, NSW and WA.
LD pass-through from the head contract
8 of 10 — your delay exposure shaped by a document you have never seen.
Defects period restarts on rectification
9 of 9 identifiable — every fix restarts the clock - and retention release waits on it.
Retention
5% in 9 of 9 identifiable — the one market-standard number in the pattern.

Figures read from publicly published documents analysed in the Australian Subcontract Index corpus, August 2026.

How it compares

Against the government's own QBCC template: the builder pattern's 2-day median EOT window vs 15 days; set-off without notice in 10 of 10 vs notice required; payment terms stretching to 60 days vs the statutory-cap 25.

The pattern matches the wider Index almost exactly - which tells you these templates ARE the market: 100% absolute time bars, 98% set-off without notice, 90% termination for convenience across 55 real subcontracts.

What to do about it

"Standard terms" means "our opening position"
A template drafted by one side is an offer, not a law of nature. The departures documents we have seen show builders accepting caps, longer notice windows and notice-before-set-off - when asked before signature.
Fix the three that hurt most
If you only negotiate three things: the time bar (10 business days, requirement not bar), a cap on LDs (5-10% of the contract sum), and written notice before any set-off.
Read the release deed now, not at final claim
Ten of ten templates condition final payment on a release. Find out at tender what you will be asked to sign away at the end.
The version you were handed is not the pattern. It's a specific document.
Templates get amended, schedules get filled in, and the risk lives in the details. The free scanner reads your actual document - every clause, benchmarked against real Australian subcontracts - in about 90 seconds.
Scan my contract free

Common questions

Do I have to accept the builder's standard terms?

No. Templates are opening positions, and the market data shows builders accept amendments on comparable packages - caps on LDs, workable notice windows, notice before set-off. Almost all of it is negotiable before signature, and almost none of it after.

Is a 2-day time bar even enforceable?

Courts have generally enforced short contractual time bars that are clearly drafted - do not count on a judge rescuing a late notice. The reliable protections are negotiating the window before signing, and building the same-day written notice habit so no window is ever missed.

Why are builder templates so much harsher than standard forms?

Because they can be. A standard form is drafted for balance between institutional parties; a builder's template is drafted by one side's lawyers to allocate risk away from that side. That's not villainy - it is drafting doing its job. The question is whether you price it, negotiate it, or absorb it.

Keep reading

General information for Australian subcontractors, not legal advice. Patterns describe publicly published documents analysed in the Index corpus; the document you are handed governs, and only a reading of that specific document (or advice on it) can tell you your position. Written by Mat Kennedy at The Construction Contracts Co.